Rabu, 17 Februari 2010

indonesia is as lazy student in school.

may be we have been soooo nauseated with the media which continuously publish the ACFTA. now i wanna make all of you more nauseated bout that. haha. :p
well, frankly i wanna post this since long long time ago but the spare time just came to me now, in the midnight. haha.

as we all know, seems like only indonesia who is really trembling and have huge uproar in facing ACFTA. 1st time, i knew this fact, i was wondering why only Indonesia who has a lot of protest. and after i was meditating, contemplating in a cave while reading newspaper *noo it's just exaggerating :)*, finally i've found what i want to know.
in fact, this uproar happen because frankly gov is not ready enough to face this ACFTA, whereas the agreement has been signed since megawati governance but they never do preparation to face ACFTA*may be there was, but only few actions*. even the growth of this ACFTA seems like kept neatly under carpet and when the carpet is blowed up, people around it, flounder about the readiness of ACFTA.

why gov of indonesia seems like not care? meanwhile singapore and malaysia did some domestic industry protection in order to strengthen them when the open market comes.may be indonesia really loves its javanese culture bout'tarsok2' or just postponing task when it frankly can be done now.

well, even if indonesia isn't ready enough to face ACFTA, why indonesia still keep insisting to join ACFTA in this year? meanwhile, laos, kambodia, myanmar, and vietnam postpone their participation up to next 5 years because they are not ready yet about the open-market. may be because of prestige? because Indonesia is the one country who invited to G-2o, so it'll be a shame if indonesia postpone the agreement? i don't think that image is more important than our economy. although our economy growth is better nowadays, but it's still fragile, and what will happen i we just force our economy condition now to get abundant import goods from china,our economy condition will be in pieces. can the good image of indonesia help the our economy condition *besides giving loan*?

and again, even if indonesia considers image is important, so why indonesia didn't use safe-guard to protect some fragile industry, that will be endured huge impact from this ACFTA? i don't know whose false is this, i'm just wondering.

what i see from this case, it resemble like lazy student analogy.
indonesia resemble like a lazy student who never make any preparation to face the examination.because he thinks that he still have much much time before exam days *tarsok-tarsok culture*,but when the exam's day comes, he will flounder. he will fail in the school *in this term is ASEAN-china* because so many competitors who are more well-prepared.

that was all just my thought, my notion from a 2nd semester-collegian, who still in bad level of analysis. anyhow i just wanna share my thought! because thought will be meaningless when it just stucks in ur head!

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar